« April 2007 | Main | June 2007 »

May 29, 2007

Episode 43: Blogging Unplugged

I have been blogging for almost 9 months now and it has been an incredibly interesting experience. 

First, in the course of writing this Blog, I have a new found respect for writers and journalists. Almost everyone I talk to that blogs says the same thing -- “I didn’t realize how much time it would take.” Well I agree. You have weeks where there is so much to talk about and others where it seems like nothing is interesting. But it always takes time and effort. I am glad that I don’t have a fixed schedule or writing deadlines. Fortunately (or unfortunately) I travel enough and the new airport security policies (arriving like 2 hours early) have given me the time needed to keep up!

You see outcome of these challenges with many executive blogs where the blog rolls out to a big fanfare, the exec does 2 posts and then, nothing. I guess they don’t have to travel like me… Maybe a few moths later some “Corporate Blog” gets put up in its place. What exactly is corporate blog? It is a bit of an oxymoron to me but, OK, I guess I define a “corporate blog” as a marketing web site written in log format.

To me, the essence of blog still must be personal. Sure, I do blog for and about EMC and I believe there is incredible value to EMC from blogging. I find it a highly beneficial way to connect with customers and folks across EMC but, it is still personal – that is the value.

At any rate, for all the folks that write for a living and have to publish on deadlines – I can now fully appreciate how hard it really is…. 

I intend to keep blogging but it still feels like I will wake up one day and have nothing left to say (some folks on my staff are laughing right now). I think they would say that me with nothing to say is an oxymoron….

Mark…

May 25, 2007

EMC World Keynote: Building the Information Infrastructure

Click here to download a pdf of my keynote presentation and click here for the video (.wmv format)

EMC World - Part 2

Four days and maybe a total of 12 hours of sleep later (yes that is like 3 hours per night) I am heading home from EMC World. I will post a copy of my keynote presentation and a video link soon.

The show was amazing and tons of fun. It was great to catch up with so may people -- the intensity and pace was just unbelievable. The days were long and jam packed with great evening events. Other than a brief jam session on stage at the House of Blues (which I hear there are already photo’s floating around), I don’t think I embarrassed myself too much! 

I think what was most exciting was the enthusiasm that I saw throughout the event. It continued to prove to me that this is by no means a commodity business. In fact, I see the opposite happening. As I noted in my talk, I believe that we will not only innovate with new technology but we will also see incredible innovation in the ways in which we use technology and processes to collaborate to put solutions together.

A number of you commented how “relaxed” I looked. Well, I don’t think it was just the Margaritas. It is simply great to see a plan come together. In July, I will have worked for EMC for 5 years. In this time I believe we have transformed and extended our role within IT while still not loosing the focus and intensity for our core businesses. At this event, probably for the first time, I saw more customers that already understood our strategy and what we are trying to do with our Information Infrastructure vision. In fact, I did not get a single “I don’t understand why you acquired x company” question while I was there! 

While it is great to have a vision and it has been great fun putting all of the pieces in place; the best feeling is when a customer walks up to me and says “this Information Infrastructure strategy really makes total sense and fits perfectly with what we want to do.”

See you all next year… 

Mark…

PS. And a personal thanks to the whole EMC team that put on the show. The amount of work to put this show on is just unbelievable and you all did a fantastic job!

May 21, 2007

EMC World

OK - it is time for the big week of the year for us EMCer’s -- EMC World. We will have 3 shows (ETS, Momentum, and the SW developer conference) running at the same time so the total attendance is like over 6000! A small city unto itself. 

Shows are interesting - to me they are like a time warp. You try to cram a months worth of meetings, training (and parties) into 4 days. By the end, I want to sleep for a week.

At any rate I hope to be able to speak directly with many of you this week. Also, I expect everyone to get up Wednesday morning for my talk (hey - if I have to get up). It should be fun. OK, maybe I have a warped idea of fun – how about hopefully it will be interesting. 

The keynote has another title but I call it "living in a 2.0 world" - I will talk about the key business and technology trends, and give you some insight into a whole new ways to innovate with EMC.

For those that attend I will give you free tickets to Universal Orlando – oh I guess you get those anyway! 

See you there -

Mark...

 

 

May 18, 2007

Episode 42: Customer Experience or Customer Survey

I took my car into the dealer a few weeks back (for a software upgrade no less). They were nice enough folks and, overall, I like them but here were a few troubling points in the process. 

The most significant was that, when I drove the car away, it was vibrating terribly and the engine was just not right. I turned around went back to the dealer. I went back in and waited 10 more minutes to talk to my “service advisor” (btw what happened to mechanics? – all I know is “service advisors” are much more expensive). I told him the issue and he pulled the car right back in and checked it.

He came back a few minutes later and said “The car is fine. It just runs a bit rough for about 15 minutes after a SW upgrade while the computer recalibrates things.” I thanked him and left. 

Clearly this was not a horrid customer service experience but it was not perfect either. They could have either run the car before I got there to get it right or a least warned me that it would run rough for a few miles.

So a couple of days later when a satisfaction survey representative called “to get feedback on my service experience” I figured I would take the time and give them the feedback. You figure in the era where we have “service advisors,” this would be valuable feedback that could significantly enhance their customer satisfaction. They could send out an EMAIL: Note to advisors – “If car is going to run like crap when customer picks it up – please warn them.” Viola – more happy customers with a simple process fix. 

So they start in with the questions – “on a scale of 1 to 5 with 5 being excellent and 1 being poor – how would you rate xxx." When they asked if the car was fixed properly, I gave them my story and the person on the phone immediately came back and said "so - on a scale of 1-5 what would that be??” “I think you missed the point,” I said. “I just gave you insight – the rating is not important.” The person came back and said – “we are just contracted to get the ratings.”

Oh man. Have we really moved customer service to a series of numbers?

I think EMC works harder than virtually any company at Total Customer Experience or TCE. One clear thing we have done is to work to connect and interact with our customers in ways to insure we get their  (your) suggestions and input; not just the ratings. I am sure we can, and will, do better but, hopefully, you (customers) believe we do gather more than just quantitative data.

While I understand the need to be able to quantify and compare, there is a lesson here for all companies. Companies get almost nothing from ratings other than data but if you can really listen to your customers, you can get information and, even knowledge! This takes time and it takes a lot more effort – but I assure you – it is worth it! 

Mark…

 

May 09, 2007

Episode 41: BHAG

I am a big believer in vision and strategy (OK – no great shock there). You might say it is more important in the fast-paced technology sector but I am not so sure. As far as I can tell fast is just the norm – in every sector.

Speed is critical but speed with alignment is explosive. Yes, all of the old analogies apply like “for the best performance everyone needs to row in the same direction.” Ahh - if were only that easy; like just saying “let’s just work together.” Wouldn’t it be great if we could just put one of those “motivational” posters in everyone’s office and have the organization accelerate? I’m sorry if I offend anyone but what a load of crap. I don’t think people are inspired by posters – they are inspired by ideas, vision, passionate leaders, true teamwork and the idea of making a difference. 

So, there are a lot of ideas on how to align an organization. You must, of course, communicate and describe the vision. That is necessary, but usually not sufficient as it just leaves too much open to interpretation. Most of us have probably played the game where you sit in a circle and someone whispers something into the ear of the person on their right. That person the “repeats” the story to the next person and it story goes around the circle and comes back to the original person. The story is never the same.

Technology has really helped us communicate better and, more importantly, even more directly. For me, even simple things like Blog’s are a great thing. One of my favorite communication foibles I would encounter in running a large organization would be what everyone called the “Mark said.” We would be in a project review and the whole plan would be changed – I would ask “what happened here – why did you make the change?” They would answer “because you told us to.” The usual debate would ensue (while I am secretly wondering if it was time to see a doctor for memory loss); what would come out is something like “remember the time you were walking through the lab and Ted showed you his pet project and you said “that looks nice” – well we thought you wanted the whole program changed.” Yikes - I quickly learned to be careful with even the simplest comments.  

While technology allows us to overcome much of the communication issues and even if everyone is now clear on the vision – that is still not enough. Assuming you have a vision and a strategy and want to align an organization, one of my favorite tools is the BHAG. BHAG stands for Big Hairy Audacious Goal (some folks use another “A” word). The term has been around for a while but I first saw the power of this principle from Mike Reutgers (Former EMC CEO/Chairman). I didn’t learn this lesson by working for Mike though – I learned it when I was at DEC and Compaq and competing against Mike and the EMC team.

The BHAG principle is simple; if you want to really make an organizational shift then the way to do it is to create a big hairy audacious goal. Like any goal, it needs to be simple, direct, and measurable. And, per the name, it also needs to be BIG; it must be a stretch for the organization. 

There is another trick to the BHAG. You don’t just communicate the vision you communicate the goal. And not just to your employees; you tell everyone so there is no room to hide. You would be surprised at the difference. It’s like the deserted island principle – you are engaged if you go to the deserted island and try to survive – you are committed if you burn your boat when you arrive.

Next, you reward based upon how well the team achieved the goal. You reward mostly for team success (not individual accomplishments) as, for every company, this is a team sport. 

Sounds pretty basic but it can be amazingly hard. It is hard because (I believe) people get caught up in setting goals that try to be too inclusive in the wrong ways. BHAG’s often appear to be very focused on a new thing without addressing many current “things.” That is OK and even necessary but people need to understand that this is really a whole team effort. BHAGs are often meant to drive transformation; or to drive new growth. These goals will typically involve a new market growth , or business transformations but, they actually need to be understood and embraced by the whole organization.

Transformations will always have individuals and teams in so called “legacy” roles or businesses – the businesses are usually as (if not more) critical to the overall corporate success and need to be respected as an integral part of the overall effort. Many times, organizations will need to sacrifice funding or resources so they can be used for a new effort – this is clearly teamwork! 

BHAGs can also turn out to be very embarrassing and even career limiting for those who are not successful but, over the years, I have learned that they also can empower and guide an organization with a speed and focus that would not normally be possible.

Mark…

 

 

May 01, 2007

Episode 40: Folklore

It is always fun to look back at and share a bit of techie history. With the recent “retirement” of Howard Shao (the founder of Documentum) – I thought I would share the story of how Documentum and EMC came together. I put retirement in quote as, for those of you who know Howard, even his hobbies are way too intense to be categorized a retirement.

Howard and I first met at a dinner in southern CA. It would have been great to say that it was at some world-class restaurant but it was closer to a Denny’s as I recall. The original purpose of the meeting was to simply discuss Documentum and Centera integration. As we talked, it was clear that we shared the same philosophy about the evolution of information and content management. At the time, Documentum was actively growing to serve many of the largest Content-centric applications. What was unique to Documentum over the other players, however, was that they were taking a platform-centric approach where most of the components were re-used and the “last mile” integrations for specific applications was being done though the addition of web-services either by Documentum or by partners. When they did acquisitions, a top-priority was always to integrate to the platform. This allowed for greater leverage but also, indirectly, was setting up a framework for doing something even more powerful – building a key building block for an Information Infrastructure. 

As we continued to talk, it was clear that we both saw the market evolving the same way. IT is clearly all about information and most of it was going to be “unstructured data” – meaning files. The initial need was to help customers leverage and manage this information to better serve individual applications but we both saw the end-game as something different. The ultimate value was managing information such that it could be leveraged by multiple applications, shared, and built with automated workflows that would allow for simplified management throughout the entire information lifecycle.

When we acquired Documentum, the primary focus still remained on solving individual application needs but the vision was (and is) far greater. It is to build an Information Infrastructure capable of leveraging information in ways that were not even imagined only a few years ago. 

That vision is starting to be realized in what we are building today. With the evolution of SOA and web services, more and more applications are being integrated. The information created is being managed more securely, it is managed across tiered storage more easily, and most importantly, it is being leveraged for greater value.

It has been great pleasure to have worked with Howard and to continue to work with the Documentum team today on realizing this vision. When we acquired Documentum, there were only a few that understood the true potential in moving from Application-centric to Information-centric IT. Today, the value is clearly apparent as we see more and more customers moving all of their information assets into managed environments using Enterprise Content Management and building the first true Information Infrastructures. 

Thanks Howard!

Mark…